No, You're the Racist, or Blogging About Obama Phones

Yesterday we asked " " It turns out that we didn't just need to explain the degree of the racism, but whether it was racist at all. After rallying around a video of a black woman explaining (incorrectly) that Obama had given her a free cell phone as a sure-fire way of boosting Mitt Romney's campaign ( ), some folks acted outraged that we would notice that they were trading in horrendous racial stereotypes. While there are plenty of studies investigating the way racial code words are used in political advertising ( ), this would not be anywhere near as subtle. This video, if placed in a Romney ad, would make the George H.W. Bush's ?look subtle by comparison: the other guy is supported by scary black people, vote Republican!?

RELATED:

The "Obama Phone" video is not being used by the Romney campaign. So we can't say that it's a racist attempt to get votes in the election. Right now, it sits in the middle ground between "stuff on the Internet" and "serious political issue." But it took one big step toward becoming a ?serious issue when, on the same day, Rush Limbaugh played it repeatedly on his radio show and the Drudge Report posted it at the top of his page. They'd probably call it humor? Limbaugh finds a lot of things funny about Democrats, . And an Obama voter who seems to be dumb? That's comedy gold, , "That's not Saturday Night Live. That is a real Obama voter." Because a video of a black woman with bad teeth and poor grasp of the history of the Universal Service Fund proves that Democrats are stupid, lazy, and, oh, black. "That is a real Obama voter." We say, that's racist.

RELATED:

Through email, Twitter, comments, and various links to our story yesterday, we've heard from conservatives shocked that we reached that conclusion. So let us walk through their arguments.

RELATED:

How is interviewing someone racist?

RELATED:

It's not. And we never said that the person who made the tape was racist. We don't even know who the person holding the camera was.? , who claims to have posted the video, made this defense: "I have no idea how it could be construed as racist because it?s simply a woman speaking for herself, you know, like voting." True enough! But the racism comes in when Drudge, Rush, the people who giddily retweeted the link, do a mental calculation that if people would just see this video they might support Romney. Because it plays on the same racist stereotypes that are usually trotted out this time of the election cycle. The video?posted on Drudge and played on Limbaugh was a black lady who has all the standard visual cues of being poor -- messed-up teeth and skin, her waistline, her yelling. Oh, and if cues aren't enough, she talks in racial terms: "Everybody in Cleveland, all the minorities got a phone. Keep Obama president, you know, he gave us a phone, he'll give us more." Drudge has a particular habit of, as put it, "hyping up tabloid news that makes black people look like violent dopes who'll do anything for more goodies from Obama." The violence of "CHICAGOLAND" is a favorite trope.?

RELATED:

Why are you making this about race?

This is the he-who-smelt-it-dealt-it argument. Or, as Stephen Colbert's persona likes to say, "I don't see race." This line of argument wants to change the subject to something other than race. Hey, what about free phones!? ?tried defending the video, saying, "The above video is hilarious. It is representative of a group of Obama voters who feel entitled to handouts from government. It does not matter what the color of the speaker is. It?s news... Conservatives should not have to shy away from such amusing examples of entitlement mentality simply because the particular proponent of that mentality happens to be black." This is intellectually dishonest, at best. We await Patterico delving into the minutiae of the Universal Service Fund. Until then, it's just "hilarious."?Specifically, it's hilarious because it uses one person to?portray?a huge group of people in a negative way is. The point of the video -- and the reason Drudge and Limbaugh hyped it -- is to say, this is what Obama voters look like: black, poor, stupid, and after your money.?The video's subject wasn't picked out because she "happens to be black," she was picked out?because?she is black.?Lee Atwater, strategist for Ronald Reagan and George H. W. Bush,? ?-- better to talk about cutting taxes and bussing, because it's "a hell of a lot more abstract than 'Ni***r, ni***r.'" Of course, this Internet meme isn't all that abstract.

Every time anyone criticizes Obama, you say it's racist!

Actually, no. The argument that the FCC's Lifeline program is mismanaged or wasteful could be made. (In fact, we'll be making exactly that argument on Monday) "Yes: Taxpayers are forced to pay $1.6 billion ??billion, with a 'B' ? to provide free cellphones for Obama voters,"? . "And if you don?t like it, you?re a racist!" That's wrong in three ways. One, the program is supported by surcharges on phone bills, not tax dollars. Two,?obviously, is that income level, not political affiliation, is what qualifies you for the Lifeline program. Three, opposing the program is not racist. The video wasn't on Drudge because Drudge is advocating getting rid of the program.

Again, it's racist because the point is to portray poor black people as stupid, and lazy, and dupes for Obama.?At? ?writes sarcastically, "Well, sure, it must be racist because this woman is black. If a white Romney protester was yelling into a camera about Obama giving out phones, nobody would have any problem with it and it wouldn?t be cited as evidence of the '47%' mentality." We'll be sure to note the next Drudge splash of a white Romney-bashing voter. We're expecting , posted by the same YouTube user as "Obama Phone," to hit Drudge any minute.

Why bring Stormfront into this?

If you want to know whether something is racist, why not go to the experts??"You?ll be glad to know that Reeve backs up her leading question by citing those mainstream conservatives at, um,?Stormfront," writes Treacher. Members of the "white pride" forum are, after all, not offended by being labeled as white supremacists. And if they cheer the video as proving their "racial inferiority" hatred, then, you know, we'd say that's pretty good proof that the video is trucking in racist stereotypes.?"The Atlantic [Wire, ahem] then takes a comment made by an individual from StormFront... in order to paint generalizations about the right," BigFurHat, originator of the video, writes. "And they do this without any sense of self-awareness whatsoever." Actually, we did this with total self-awareness. Here's the last words of our post:

To any conservatives offended at being associated with such vile people, let us say it for you: Using one mockable person you found on the Internet to make generalizations about half the country is lazy and stupid.

There are really two points here: First, it is not fair to equate all conservatives who laughed at the "Obama Phone" with white supremacists. Second, however, is that those who bristle at the suggestion they are racist but still argue the video is hilarious are wrong on one of those counts.

Source: http://news.yahoo.com/no-youre-racist-blogging-obama-phones-000300172.html

soda bread recipe vanderbilt evan mathis staff sgt. robert bales jason russell norfolk state st patrick s day parade