Sunday, May 12, 2013

GOP ready to push Benghazi case into 2014, beyond

FILE - This June 7, 2012 file photo shows U.S. Ambassador to the U.N. Susan Rice listening during a news conference at the UN. Senior State Department officials pressed for changes in the talking points that U.N. Ambassador Susan Rice used after the deadly attack on the U.S. diplomatic mission in Libya last September, expressing concerns that Congress might criticize the Obama administration for ignoring warnings of a growing threat in Benghazi. (AP Photo/Bebeto Matthews)

FILE - This June 7, 2012 file photo shows U.S. Ambassador to the U.N. Susan Rice listening during a news conference at the UN. Senior State Department officials pressed for changes in the talking points that U.N. Ambassador Susan Rice used after the deadly attack on the U.S. diplomatic mission in Libya last September, expressing concerns that Congress might criticize the Obama administration for ignoring warnings of a growing threat in Benghazi. (AP Photo/Bebeto Matthews)

FILE - In this Sept. 14, 2012 file photo, Libyan military guards check one of the U.S. Consulate's burnt out buildings during a visit by Libyan President Mohammed el-Megarif, not shown, to the U.S. Consulate to express sympathy for the death of the American ambassador, Chris Stevens and his colleagues in the deadly attack on the Consulate in Benghazi, Libya. Senior State Department officials pressed for changes in the talking points that U.N. Ambassador Susan Rice used after the deadly attack on the U.S. diplomatic mission in Libya last September, expressing concerns that Congress might criticize the Obama administration for ignoring warnings of a growing threat in Benghazi. (AP Photo/Mohammad Hannon)

(AP) ? Steady drips of information about a horrific night in Libya are fueling Republican arguments and ads designed to fire up the conservative base and undercut the Democrats' early favorite for president in 2016.

Democratic and Republican strategists sharply disagree on the issue's power to influence elections next year and beyond. But after eight months of trying, Democrats are still struggling to move past last September's terrorist attack on the U.S. diplomatic compound in Benghazi, which killed ambassador Chris Stevens and three other Americans.

Democrats insist that an independent inquiry, the dismissal of several State Department officials, and nine congressional hearings leave little new to say on the matter. But Friday turned up the sort of nuggets that feed conservative activists' belief that a major scandal may still be at hand.

Newly revealed communications show that senior State Department officials pressed for changes in the talking points that U.N. Ambassador Susan Rice used a few days after the Benghazi attacks. These senior officials expressed concerns that Congress might criticize the Obama administration for ignoring warnings of a growing threat in Libya.

The White House has insisted that it made only stylistic changes to the intelligence agency talking points, in which Rice suggested that spontaneous protests over an anti-Islamic video set off the deadly attack. The new details suggest a greater degree of political sensitivity and involvement by the White House and State Department.

Rice and others eventually acknowledged that the Benghazi assault on Sept. 11, 2012, was a premeditated terrorist attack. Republicans say her Sept. 16 televised remarks were just the start of administration efforts to mislead Americans about what happened in Libya.

The Benghazi violence was heavily politicized from the start, occurring less than two months before President Barack Obama's re-election. Moreover, the secretary of state at the time was Hillary Rodham Clinton. The former senator and first lady infuriates many conservatives and ranks high in speculation about the Democrats' 2016 presidential nominee.

Friday brought another round of conservative broadsides against Clinton, Obama and the administration's handling of the Benghazi matter. Sen. Rand Paul of Kentucky, a possible Republican presidential contender, wrote an opinion piece in The Washington Times restating his view that Obama should have fired Clinton.

Campaigning later in Iowa, Paul said he thinks the Benghazi affair "precludes Hillary Clinton from ever holding office."

The conservative group American Crossroads released a 90-second video asking if Clinton was "part of a cover-up." The video, like emails and letters from several other groups, asked for political donations.

The Benghazi tragedy hands Republicans a host of political opportunities, although none without complications. It may be difficult for average voters to sift through the chronology, assess blame, or even follow the logic of GOP arguments.

For instance, claims that Clinton and others ignored calls for greater diplomatic security in Libya might be linked to the four American deaths. But accusations about the post-attack talking points ? which sometimes seem to dominate the current debate ? have nothing to do with possibly preventing the deaths, thus robbing them of that moral heft.

Democrats note that a major independent inquiry into Benghazi, issued in December, found that the State Department badly mishandled security needs in Libya. But it blamed officials no higher than the assistant secretary of state level.

Republican strategist Kyle Downey said Benghazi already exposes a trove of Democratic vulnerabilities, which might grow as inquiries continue. He said Republicans should use the findings to challenge the competence, truthfulness and judgment of Clinton, Obama and other administration officials. Republicans, Downey said, should let the politics play out in terms of which charges gain the most traction.

Some strategists say the Benghazi narrative may prove more valuable for congressional Republicans in next year's elections than in 2016, which is far off. House Republicans, in particular, can seize on Benghazi to motivate their base and donors, and to fend off possible primary challenges from the right.

Democrats say Republicans are nakedly exploiting the Benghazi deaths, and voters won't like it.

"Republicans are a desperate party right now, trying to do whatever they can to dirty up the president to make some gains in 2014, and to dirty up Secretary Clinton because they're terrified she'll walk into the White House," said Democratic consultant Doug Thornell. "This is an attempt to keep their base together and motivated" after Obama's victories in 2008 and 2012.

Thornell predicted Benghazi will prove no more useful as a political "scandal" than did the highly criticized "Fast and Furious" gun-tracking program and the federally subsidized but ultimately doomed Solyndra energy company.

White House press secretary Jay Carney has spent hours trying to dismiss GOP accusations, including those that Obama sought to hide the fact that Islamic terrorists were behind the Benghazi attack. "The whole effort here by Republicans to find some hidden mystery comes to nothing because the president called it an act of terror," Carney told reporters Friday.

Benghazi may remain a white-hot topic in many conservative regions and talk shows for some time. At Wednesday's hearing before the House Oversight Committee, Rep. Cynthia Lummis, R-Wyo., told relatives of the four Americans killed in Benghazi that her constituents "think about you all the time."

___

Follow Charles Babington on Twitter: https://twitter.com/cbabington

Associated Press

Source: http://hosted2.ap.org/APDEFAULT/3d281c11a96b4ad082fe88aa0db04305/Article_2013-05-11-US-Benghazi-Politics/id-d868e90aeca949d99b3bf051ddad01ac

tyler perry whitney houston r kelly r. kelly macular degeneration whitney houston funeral judi dench bobby brown leaves funeral

The problem with iTunes and Windows 8

The problem with iTunes and Windows 8

According to the chief financial officer of Windows -- what, your company doesn't have a product-level CFO? -- Microsoft has laid out the welcome mat for iTunes for Windows 8, but Apple has yet to come a knocking. Why ever could that be?

I was asked recently on Twitter why the Mac App Store wasn't bundled into the desktop iTunes app the way the iOS App Store is, and so many other things are. I don't know the official rationale, but my immediate instinct was -- because it's the Mac App Store, and that means it doesn't have to be ported to Windows. And if it doesn't have to get ported to Windows, it doesn't have to go into iTunes.

After all, iTunes is the only major piece of software Apple currently ports to Windows. Safari for Windows, after a brief, uneventful life, has gone missing in action, and QuickTime and the various iCloud and iOS management utilities are just that -- utilities. iLife doesn't get ported. Pro tools don't get ported. Just iTunes.

Steve Jobs once called iTunes for Windows a glass of water in hell. I've joked it was revenge for Office on Mac. Really it was a business necessity in the pre-post-PC world. iPods -- and eventually iPhones and iPads -- needed iTunes on the desktop to purchase, manage, and sync media and apps, the vast majority of computers ran Windows, and so iTunes had to run on Windows.

And that screwed it over for everyone. Apple, in their infinitely looped wisdom, decided it would be easier for them to port, and easier for us to use, a single, monolithic iTunes app than anything more specific or distributed, a single jack-of-all-trades app, wrapped up for easy transplant, rather than several masters of one carefully cut apart and crafted. And as iOS grew, and new content types like apps and iBooks, and new use cases, like Wi-Fi sync grew, iTunes on both Mac and Windows grew (and grew).

Absent the need to port to Windows, we get the light, purpose-built Mac App Store. On iOS get separate iTunes Store, Music and Video apps, we get a separate App Store, and we get separate iBooks, Podcasts, and iTunes U apps. We get many little shots of water that aren't anywhere nearly as hellish.

iTunes desktop isn't so easily reinvented. So it's being obsoleted.

In a post-PC world, a lot of the jobs formerly required of iTunes on the desktop have been pushed up into the iCloud. You can pretty much setup, manage, fill, and sync a new iOS device, out of the box, without ever once plugging it into iTunes on the desktop. (I don't think I've synced with iTunes on the desktop even once since the iPhone 4S launched with iOS 5 in October of 2011.)

Sure, transferring big media files and moving around large numbers of icons are still painful in the wireless world, but that's something Apple can and needs to fix, and inevitably it won't be by going back to the iTunes desktop.

It's the reason why, when the original iPad launched in 2010, it didn't run full-blown iTunes either. You couldn't tether and iPhone to an iPad for device management purposes. iOS didn't need no sticking iTunes desktop. And it's the reason why Windows 8 probably won't get a "Metro" version of iTunes desktop either.

Microsoft is still dominant-beyond-dominant in the PC market, but the PC market isn't as important as it used to be. New iOS customers, the kind who are drawn to things like Windows 8 "Metro", are probably also drawn to online services like iCloud, Dropbox, Skydrive, Spotify, Netflix, etc. and they'll do just fine without traditional iTunes ported and portly on the Surface RT. Mainstream customers, the kind who are sticking with Windows XP or Windows 7, are also likely sticking with iTunes desktop, and they'll be just fine with traditional iTunes running as a traditional desktop app.

iTunes for Mac is in the midst of a transition. It's not impossible to see where it's going over the next few years, and it's not the stodgy old desktop we all know and love to hate. It's going somewhere new. If an how iTunes for Windows goes with it will depend on Windows' importance in the post-PC world. Maybe iTunes will become more an iCloud-powered player than device management game.

That Microsoft has re-discovered the tablet market is nice. That they're experimenting with mix-mode devices is interesting. But Metro probably doesn't need full-blown iTunes any more than iOS does, and the Windows 8 Store probably won't get old-style iTunes much faster than the App Store will get old-style Office.

The world has changed.

    


Source: http://feedproxy.google.com/~r/TheIphoneBlog/~3/jiF6JGJhAyo/story01.htm

USC shooting halloween lsu football lsu football Jessie Andrews bloomberg bloomberg

Samsung WB800F


The Samsung WB800F ($299.99 direct) is a compact superzoom cameras with an impressively sharp 21x zoom lens.?It's also got a responsive touch screen and one of the better Wi-Fi implementations we've seen. But the Editors' Choice Canon PowerShot SX280 HS takes better pictures at higher ISOs, and bests the WB800F by adding a GPS and 1080p60 video capture.?

Design and Features
The WB800F looks a lot like other recent Samsung long zoom cameras, like the 18x WB250F. The camera, available in white, cobalt black, or red, measures about 2.6 by 4.2 by 1.5 inches (HWD), weighs 8.3 ounces, and features a rather deep handgrip with a leatherette covering. It's slightly bigger on all edges than the Canon SX280 HS (2.5 by 4.2 by 1.3 inches, 8.2 ounces), but both cameras can slide into your pocket. Some of the W800F's extra size is accounted for by a larger lens; it's a 21x zoom design that covers a 23-483mm (35mm equivalent) range?a bit wider than the 25-500mm on the SX280, but not quite as telephoto. The aperture is an impressive f/2.8 on the wide end, but it dwindles to f/5.9 when zoomed. You'll have to go with a much larger camera, like the Editors' Choice Panasonic Lumix DMC-FZ200, to get a long zoom that stays at f/2.8 through its entire focal length range.

The engineers at Samsung have taken advantage of the largish body and implemented a solid control layout. The top plate features the Power button, the Direct Link button for quick Wi-Fi sharing, a manual flash release, the shutter release, a zoom rocker, and a mode dial. The rear of the camera houses a dedicated video recording button, as well a four-way controller that has buttons for the flash output, macro shooting, drive mode and self-timer, and the amount of information displayed on the LCD.

Tapping the Menu button brings up an overlay menu that gives you access to additional shooting settings. These include exposure compensation, white balance control, ISO, focus settings, metering options, image compression settings, and a few other odds and ends. ?You can adjust the settings via the four-way control pad, or directly via touch. The 3-inch 460k-dot LCD display is just as responsive as the one on the Android-powered Samsung Galaxy Camera, but it's nowhere near as big or sharp; the Galaxy has a 4.8-inch screen with 921k-dot resolution.

Like other Samsung cameras, Wi-Fi comes standard with the WB800F. And Samsung gets everything right with its implementation?you can connect to a Wi-Fi hotspot from the camera and post photos and videos to Facebook, Picasa, YouTube, and SkyDrive, Samsung AllShare Play, or send them via email. ?If you're not near Wi-Fi, the camera can act as a hotspot and transfer photos directly to your phone using the free Samsung Smart Camera App for iOS and Android. This app also allows you to use your phone or tablet as a remote viewfinder; a live feed of what the lens is seeing is shown on your device and you can control the zoom, flash output, self-timer, and fire a photo without touching the camera.

Performance and ConclusionsSamsung WB800F : Benchmark Tests
The WB800F is speedy. It can start and take a shot in about 1.7 seconds and its shutter lag is a short 0.1-second. It can shoot at 7 or 3 frames per second, but at either speed it's limited to a 6-shot burst. You'll have to wait for about 11 seconds for all the files to write to the card after the burst. Compare this with the Galaxy Camera, which, due to its Android operating system, starts slower, in about 2.9 seconds. Its also slower to focus and fire, recording a 0.4-second shutter lag, but it can record a 20-shot burst at 3.8 frames per second.

I use Imatest to check the quality of photos captured by the WB800F. Photos are sharp, scoring 1,992 lines per picture height; we require an image to score 1,800 lines on a center-weighted test to pass muster. Imatest also checks for noise, which can make a photo appear grainy as you increase the camera's sensitivity to light, numerically expressed as ISO. The WB800F actually scores well on the standard Imatest noise test, staying at 1.2 percent?a bit below our cutoff of 1.5 percent?through its top ISO 3200 setting. But close examination of images on our calibrated NEC MultiSync PA271W display shows that image detail is smudged away at settings as low as ISO 800, a sure sign of an overly aggressive noise reduction algorithm. The SX280 HS only manages to keep noise below 1.5 percent through ISO 1600, and it also is smudgy at ISO 800 or above, but its noise is in a tighter, less blocky pattern. Neither camera can match our Editors' Choice for midrange compacts, the Canon PowerShot Elph 330 HS in high ISO performance; it's one of the best cameras with a 1/2.3-inch sensor that we've seen recently. It keeps noise below 1.5 percent through ISO 1600, and does a great job with detail at that setting. Its zoom lens is much less ambitious at 10x (25-250mm), but it's worth considering if you don't need 21x.

Video is recorded in MP4 format at 1080p30 or 720p30 quality. Footage looks good?it's sharp, smooth, and colors are accurate, but there is a bit evidence of the rolling shutter effect when panning the camera. This causes the top of the frame to move faster than the bottom, which is similar to the rubber pencil visual trick that has fascinated many a child. On the plus side, the sound of the lens zooming in and out is quiet; it's barely audible on the soundtrack.

You can connect the camera to your HDTV via a micro HDMI port, and there's a micro USB port you can use to plug the camera into a computer, and you will need to use it to charge the battery; the WB800F doesn't ship with a dedicated charger, so you'll have to plug it into the wall via an included USB to AC adapter when the battery gets low. Photos are recorded on SD, SDHC, or SDXC memory cards.

The Samsung WB800F is a good superzoom, but a few missteps prevent it from being a great one. Its lens is impressive, covering a very wide 23mm angle on the wide end and packing a 21x zoom ratio. In good light, images are impressive, but overzealous noise reduction rubs away detail when set to higher ISOs. Wi-Fi is a useful feature if you like to post photos on the go, but it's been better implemented in Samsung's own Galaxy Camera. Wi-Fi is also available in our Editors' Choice compact superzoom, the Canon PowerShot SX280 HS, which is a little bit more expensive, but produces more detailed photos at higher ISO settings and is a little bit smaller. And the aforementioned Canon PowerShot Elph 330 HS has a much less ambitious 10x zoom lens, but also includes Wi-Fi support, and images at high ISO settings are notably better than those from either the WB800F or the SX280 HS.

Source: http://feedproxy.google.com/~r/ziffdavis/pcmag/~3/Wq2fuLQQwkM/0,2817,2418720,00.asp

New Girl Avalanna Gigi Chao Jimmy Hoffa Ed Hochuli Opie modern family

Saturday, May 11, 2013

Connecting Images To Words: A Good Memory Training Technique ...

When you are trying to learn a new language, memory training techniques can help you learn and remember words a lot quicker. Before, learning a new language mostly consisted of saying phrases and words over and over again. This language learning method could help in pronunciation, but it isn?t really the best way to try to remember words. Using certain memory techniques that work best with language, you?ll be able to retain unfamiliar vocabulary for months and years, and if done the right way, for the rest of your life.

An effective memory strategy that can help you when you?re learning a foreign language is to link foreign words to things which are familiar to you. Nonetheless, for this method to work, you have to connect the foreign word to an outrageous image so you?re more likely to remember it for a long period.

One challenge with remembering foreign phrases and words is that they are unfamiliar to us. They just do not make any sense to us. The key is to associate foreign words to things that we are familiar with. Next, we should think of outrageous or silly images for those foreign words so they stick to our memory. It?s easy for our brain to discard the everyday things we run into. If what we see or hear is dull, it will most likely be overlooked. However, the silly, crazy, or unusual things usually have greater impact and we often remember them. This is precisely why absurd or silly images work best when you?re trying to learn a foreign language.

Let us take the word ?caliente? as an example. It?s Spanish for ?hot?. The issue with this word is that it?s not even close to sounding or looking like the word ?hot?. So what do you do to be sure you don?t forget this Spanish word and know that it means ?hot?? There are four syllables in ?caliente? so you could try breaking it down. For the first two syllables (?cali?), you can link it with the collie, the dog breed, because they sound like it. You may associate the third syllable (?en?) with ?in? (as in inside) and the last syllable (?te?) with ?tea?, the drink. Even though the last syllable of the word ?caliente? is pronounced to rhyme with the English word ?day?, it is close enough. We can picture a collie inside an air conditioned house on a very hot day, sitting on an easy chair like a man would, having iced tea.

It must be mentioned that image association is different from person to person. Let?s imagine that in your case, if you ever see the word ?caliente?, you?ll see a dog sipping tea inside a house on a hot day. This ridiculous image will be imprinted in your memory, making you remember that ?caliente? means hot.

You have to understand that it takes some time for memory training methods like this to be perfected. When you first start practicing, it will be slow going; but once you get the hang of it with creating images that work for you, the process becomes faster.

Source: http://www.legacyrc.com/education/connecting-images-to-words-a-good-memory-training-technique-when-you-are-learning-a-new-language/

usain bolt Closing Ceremony London 2012 Tom Daley Leryn Franco The Campaign Kinesio tape randy travis

No Jitter | Post | Another UCaaS Option Joins the Fray

Another UCaaS Option Joins the Fray Genband announces a white-label service in which it will provide a cloud service to service providers and the channel.

Genband announces a white-label service in which it will provide a cloud service to service providers and the channel.

Cloud communications services are pretty common, but there are many different models. I surveyed this market a couple of years ago in the "2011 Ultimate Guide to VoIP and UC Services" and found 210 providers offering CaaS and UCaaS in the U.S. Many offer basic telephony, while others offer full Unified Communications. Many of these services are startups, while a few view their services as carrier class. Genband has joined the latter class with a white-label service called NUViA.

NUViA consists of a suite of Multimedia Communications bundles and service establishment support. Features include:

* A suite of differentiated offers including multimedia messaging, multimedia conferencing and collaboration, mobility, high definition voice over IP, and desktop integration
* Rich Communications Service (RCS), which provides mobile UC features
* Mobile and desktop clients and agent support
* Flexible on-demand cloud capacity and elasticity
* Interoperability with a wide variety of fixed and mobile IP endpoints and CPE
* Business continuity and communications reliability

Genband stressed particular features and characteristics of NUViA that it says will be especially attractive to service providers and channel partners:

* Multi-tenancy capabilities
* Support from services professionals to help with the cloud migration
* Broad service enablement capabilities for partners, including network operations and maintenance and customer provisioning, as well as enterprise Session Border Control and customer premises equipment (CPE) as required
* Reselling Genband's service lets service providers more quickly penetrate new markets and test viability of services and bundles

Genband already has a customer for the new offering: Arrow S3, which will market the NUViA service under the SynapS3 ucCLOUD brand.

NUVia is one of the services presented at the Genband Perspectives 2013 conference.

Source: http://www.nojitter.com/post/240154605/another-ucaas-option-joins-the-fray

once upon a time RG3 Monsters University nfl playoff schedule Rex Ryan tattoo Alaska earthquake green bay packers

Police: Ohio captive suffered 5 miscarriages

Ariel Castro appears in Cleveland Municipal court Thursday, May 9, 2013, in Cleveland. Castro was charged with four counts of kidnapping and three counts of rape after three women missing for about a decade and one of their young daughters were found alive at his home earlier in the week. (AP Photo/Tony Dejak)

Ariel Castro appears in Cleveland Municipal court Thursday, May 9, 2013, in Cleveland. Castro was charged with four counts of kidnapping and three counts of rape after three women missing for about a decade and one of their young daughters were found alive at his home earlier in the week. (AP Photo/Tony Dejak)

Cuyahoga County Prosecutor Timothy J. McGinty leaves Fort Huntington Park and chased by the media after holding a news-conference regarding Ariel Castro's involvement in the disappearance of Amanda Berry, Michelle Knight, and Gina DeJesus Thursday, May 9, 2013, in Cleveland. (AP Photo/Tony Dejak)

Law enforcement officials gather evidence at the crime scene where three women were hjeld captive in Cleveland, Ohio, Thursday, May 9, 2013. Ariel Castro, a 52-year-old former school bus driver, is being held on $8 million bail under a suicide watch in jail, where he is charged with rape and kidnapping for allegedly abducting three women and holding them captive in his home for a decade. (AP Photo/David Duprey)

Ariel Castro appears in Cleveland Municipal court alongside defense attorney Kathleen DeMetz, right, Thursday, May 9, 2013, in Cleveland. Castro was charged with four counts of kidnapping and three counts of rape after three women missing for about a decade and one of their young daughters were found alive at his home earlier in the week. (AP Photo/Tony Dejak)

Defense attorney Kathleen DeMetz, second from right, talks with Pedro Castro as Onil Castro, left, watches and Ariel Castro, right, looks down, in Cleveland Municipal court Thursday, May 9, 2013, in Cleveland. Ariel Castro was charged with four counts of kidnapping and three counts of rape. Pedro and Onil Castro, were held but faced no immediate charges. (AP Photo/Tony Dejak)

(AP) ? Prosecutors said Thursday they may seek the death penalty against Ariel Castro, the man accused of imprisoning three women at his home for a decade, as police charged that he impregnated one of his captives at least five times and made her miscarry by starving her and punching her in the belly.

The horrific allegations were contained in a police report that also said another one of the women, Amanda Berry, was forced to give birth in a plastic kiddie pool.

Cuyahoga County prosecutor Timothy McGinty said his office will decide whether to bring aggravated murder charges punishable by death in connection with the pregnancies that were terminated by force.

"Capital punishment must be reserved for those crimes that are truly the worst examples of human conduct," he said. "The reality is we still have brutal criminals in our midst who have no respect for the rule of law or human life."

Castro, a 52-year-old former school bus driver, is being held on $8 million bail under a suicide watch in jail, where he is charged with rape and kidnapping.

McGinty said Castro will be charged for every act of sexual violence, assault and other crimes committed against the women, suggesting the counts could number in the hundreds, if not thousands.

Among the chilling details in the police report, obtained Thursday by news organizations:

? Berry, now 27, told officers that she was forced to give birth in a plastic pool in the house so it would be easier to clean up. Berry said she, her baby, now 6, and the two other rescued women had never been to a doctor during their captivity.

? Michelle Knight, now 32, said her five pregnancies ended after Castro starved her for at least two weeks and "repeatedly punched her in the stomach until she miscarried." She also said Castro forced her to deliver Berry's baby under threat of death if the infant died. Knight said that when the newborn stopped breathing, she revived the child through mouth-to-mouth resuscitation.

? All three women said Castro chained them up in the basement but eventually let them live upstairs on the second floor. Each woman told a similar story about being abducted after accepting a ride from Castro.

During his brief arraignment Thursday, Castro tried to hide his face, tucking his chin inside his collar. He appeared to close his eyes during the hearing and awkwardly signed documents while handcuffed. He did not speak or enter a plea.

In court, prosecutor Brian Murphy said Castro used the women "in whatever self-gratifying, self-serving way he saw fit."

Kathleen DeMetz, a public defender assigned to represent him at the hearing, didn't comment on his guilt or innocence or object when prosecutors recommended bail be set at $5 million. The judge, instead, ordered Castro held on $8 million.

Castro has been under arrest since Monday, when Berry broke out of his run-down house and called 911 while he was away. Police found the two other women inside. The women had vanished separately between 2002 and 2004 when they 14, 16 and 20.

Berry and former captive Gina DeJesus, 22, went home with relatives on Wednesday. Knight was reported in good condition at a Cleveland hospital.

The police report gave a detailed account of their escape, beginning with Berry's discovery that a door was unlocked, leaving only a bolted outer door between her and freedom.

Berry feared it was a test: She said Castro occasionally left a door unlocked to test them. But she called to neighbors on a porch for help and was able to get out.

Police then entered the house and found the other women, who threw themselves into the officers' arms.

Castro's two brothers, who were arrested with him but later cleared of involvement in the kidnapping case, appeared in court on unrelated charges Thursday and were released.

Ariel Castro's former daughter-in-law, Monica Stephens, told The Associated Press that her former husband said Castro had an extremely violent nature.

"He was always described to me as a violent, just a scary violent person," Stephens said.

"He talked about how his father had beaten him and his mother severely. They were like hostages in their own house. They were locked in," said the woman, who now lives in Florida.

A musician who often practiced at Castro's house said he was there last week and heard noises, "like banging on the wall." Ricky Sanchez said he asked Castro about it, and he blamed it on the dogs. He also said Castro ? a bass guitarist in merengue and salsa bands ? liked to play his music loud.

On his most recent visit, Sanchez said, a little girl came out from the kitchen and stared at him but didn't say anything. He said he also noticed there were four or five locks on the outside door.

"When I was about to leave, I tried to open the door. I couldn't even, because there were so many locks in there," he said.

___

Associated Press writers Mike Householder and freelance reporter John Coyne in Cleveland; Brendan Farrington in Florida; and Dan Sewell in Cincinnati contributed to this report.

Associated Press

Source: http://hosted2.ap.org/APDEFAULT/3d281c11a96b4ad082fe88aa0db04305/Article_2013-05-09-Missing%20Women%20Found/id-63a412a60e22422199b549168167e4b5

annette funicello joel osteen Accidental Racist Fallon Fox Chris Webber linda perry luke bryan

The Sky-High Price of Chemotherapy: Why Do Cancer Drugs Cost So Much?

As if it?s not bad enough to find out you have cancer, nearly all cancer patients have to also contend with how to pay for treatment, including somehow managing the sky-high cost of drugs (chemotherapy). It seems like insult to injury (quite literally), right?

Overall, cancer drug prices are skyrocketing. Of the 12 drugs approved by the Food and Drug Administration for various cancer conditions in 2012, 11 were priced above $100,000 for a year of treatment. Writing in an op-ed in the New York Times in October 2012, three physicians at New York City?s Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center noted that ?the typical new cancer drug coming on the market a decade ago cost $4,500 per month (in 2012 dollars); since 2010 the median price has been around $10,000.?

?

?

These and other injustices led an international group of doctors to band together and call for lowering the cost of chemotherapy drugs. In the medical journal Blood the physicians?all of whom specialize in treating a form of leukemia, or cancer of the blood?wrote that cancer drug costs are ?too high, unsustainable, may compromise access of needy patients to highly effective therapy, and are harmful to the sustainability of our national healthcare systems.?

The doctors went so far as to say that charging high prices for drugs that are needed to save lives or improve health is a form of profiteering, like jacking up the price of necessities like food and water after a natural disaster. Thanks, too, to a puzzling price-fixing equation used by pharmaceutical companies, the longer that a given chemotherapeutic treatment prolongs life, the more it costs. Certain forms of a treatment for leukemia can cost each patient as much as $138,000 per year?and that?s not uncommon for drugs to get rid of cancer and keep it away.

One group of doctors went so far as to say that charging very high prices for cancer drugs that people need to live is a form of profiteering.

Needless to say, many patients cannot afford prices like these. They?and their families?too often go broke and die trying to pay for this and other treatments, which can include surgery and radiation. In one bizarre policy, in many U.S. states health insurance companies will refuse to reimburse cancer patients if they take the drug in a pill form versus an intravenous (IV) treatment at a clinic. Thankfully, more states are finally fighting back on harmful policies like this: Following legislation passed in 22 other states and the District of Columbia, the Cancer Treatment Fairness Act recently passed both the Florida Senate and House; if approved by the state?s governor it would require insurers to cover oral chemo treatment the same way they cover IV treatment done in a clinic (what?s called an ?oral chemotherapy parity law?).

But the bigger question is, of course: Why do these drug prices have to be so high in the first place? What makes them so expensive? First comes the cost of researching the drugs. The average cancer drug costs an estimated $60 to $90 million to research.?

A 2012 review published in Nature found that 89 percent of studies on possible cancer drugs published findings that other scientists couldn?t replicate, meaning they weren?t the solid, definitive findings that move us closer to safer, more effective medications. Put another way, after all this research, the scientists had pretty much hit a dead end.?Professor B.M. Hegde, M.D., Ph.D., says that the competitive publish-or-perish climate in cancer research prompts scientists to sometimes omit unfavorable data or manipulate their results in order to assure that their grants continue.?

But research is not even the biggest expense. The U.S. pharmaceutical industry spent 24.4 percent of each dollar of sales on promoting the drug, as compared to 13.4 percent spent on research and development, according to a 2008 study in PLOS Medicine by York University researchers who collected data from the pharmaceutical industry and physicians.

Since the dollars spent on marketing are part of the drugs? high tab, what does that marketing budget buy? In addition to advertising to physicians, pharmaceutical companies market to us, the folks they hope will become consumers of the medication. When they sponsor telethons, races, walks, and events that raise money for research, they also spread a key message: ?Early detection is your best protection.?

Early detection is often valuable. But detecting cancer (which can then be treated, at a profit for big pharma and health insurers) and preventing cancer in the first place are two different things. And when it comes to prevention, we are largely failing as a country. A recent President?s Cancer Panel report targeted harmful toxins as one of this country?s least-studied contributors to the number of new cases of cancer. ?Prevention consists of finding out what causes cancer and minimizing those risks. But there?s no business model for doing that,? says Bill Couzens, the founder of LessCancer, a nonprofit organization that focuses on prevention. ?We now have more cancer than ever before. But we never ask why?We need to ask those questions.?

Preventing cancer may not be so profitable, but treating it clearly is. Even accounting for the research and marketing costs spent to develop and promote cancer drugs doesn?t explain the astronomical drug prices, say the physicians writing in Blood. ?Once a company sells about a billion dollars of a drug, most of the rest is profit,? they wrote in their article. For one such leukemia drug released in 2001, that benchmark was passed in 2003, leaving nearly a decade?and counting?of pure profit for its manufacturer. ?Prices get jacked up when the need is great,? says Couzens. ?It?s a much-needed industry. It?s the business to be in, unfortunately.? Now we just need to find a way to make prevention as profitable, or moreso.

Have you experienced the high cost of chemo drugs yourself? What was your experience like??

Related Stories on TakePart:

Have Cancer but No Insurance? No Problem?You Can Pay With Your Life

The Most Expensive Prescription Drugs in the U.S.

Americans Struggling to Pay for Prescription Drugs

Alison Rose Levy has covered health, food, and the environment on Huffington Post, AlterNet, PsychologyToday, and Intent.com. The writer of two best-selling health books, Alison talks to health and eco leaders on her weekly radio program, Connect the Dots, on the Progressive Radio Network.?@alisonroselevy | TakePart.com

Source: http://news.yahoo.com/sky-high-price-chemotherapy-why-cancer-drugs-cost-223821525.html

glen rice jr bars lindzi cox bachelor finale courtney robertson ben flajnik hunger games premiere